Essay:"Argumentation is tiresome"
|This essay contains the opinions of one or more authors and does not necessarily represent the views of Mises Wiki or the Mises Institute. Mises Wiki essays may sometimes contain opinions that are not widely accepted by Austrian school thinkers, but nonetheless reside on the site to help stimulate critical thinking, constructive dialog, and an open-minded process of creative problem-solving furthering the growth of the body of Austrian school thought.|
Argument: Argumentation is tiresome.
Counter-argument: Doesn't each argument only need to happen once? There are only three possibilities: you win, they win, or you determine that nobody can win. Then you archive the results and how/why you got there for next time, so you don't have to cover the same ground twice.
Counter-counter-argument: Have you never later thought, "I should said THIS!"
Counter-counter-counter-argument: Well, then you go back to the archive and say "Let me revise and extend my remarks" and reopen debate. Even if the debate keeps getting re-opened and re-closed over a lifetime, though, there will be long periods in which there is no arguing because no one can think of further arguments, which gives you plenty of time to accomplish other stuff.