Essay:Banning the box
|This essay contains the opinions of one or more authors and does not necessarily represent the views of Mises Wiki or the Mises Institute. Mises Wiki essays may sometimes contain opinions that are not widely accepted by Austrian school thinkers, but nonetheless reside on the site to help stimulate critical thinking, constructive dialog, and an open-minded process of creative problem-solving furthering the growth of the body of Austrian school thought.|
Libertarians should oppose the "Ban the Box" movement. There was another law, the Americans with Disabilities Act, that was intended to force a bunch of accommodations down employers' throats. What has that done for the employment rates of disabled people? See for yourself.
In light of that experience, what should we expect that "Ban the Box" will do for people with criminal records? Virginia CURE says, "Businesses are missing out on qualified applicants because they are making assumptions about ex-offenders before interviewing them." Very well then, let the market punish them, as it would have punished those who discriminated against disabled people without a good reason!
The whole point of giving people a publicly-available criminal record is so that employers can discriminate against him. If, say, cocaine possession should not be a reason to discriminate, then legalize cocaine and expunge the records of those convicted for it, and you won't have to worry about it. There's a libertarian way, and an anti-libertarian way, to deal with this problem.
- National Bureau of Economic Research (23 January 2014). "Consequences of the Americans With Disabilities Act". http://www.nber.org/digest/dec98/w6670.html.
- Virginia CURE. "SUPPORT HB 892 and SB 250 to "Ban the Box" Across Virginia". http://org2.salsalabs.com/o/6220/c/1529/p/dia/action3/common/public/index.sjs?action_KEY=16312.